Wednesday, September 25, 2013

A grainy vision for food surplus - Financial Express

| Published: Sep 25 2013, 02:50 IST

SUMMARYA surplus of 31 mt, worth Rs 74,000 crore, needs to be ploughed back into the economy

Tejinder Narang
As on September 1, 2013, India’s total stock of foodgrains, stored and managed by FCI, was 65 million tonnes (mt). At an average economic cost (includes carrying cost of about $100/tonne per annum) of R24,000/tonne (R27,000 for rice and R20,000 for wheat—in a 55:45 ratio), the stock is worth R1,56,000 crore, or roughly $24 billion. The maximum buffer requirement, after considering the Food Security Act, is 34 mt (presumptive on October 1, 2013, according to the CACP discussion paper number 6 on buffer norms). Thus, a surplus of nearly 31 mt, or of R74,000 crore ($12 billion), is well established. The need, however, is to substantially plough back this excess into the national economy.
The question remains, why haven’t we been able to recoup even most of it? Speedy disposal of grains from the central pool has become crucial for the reduction of domestic inflation of cereals, which is averaging 17%, and reining in unsustainable fiscal deficit/CAD, given our potential for export. But the food ministry has repeatedly conceived non-viable proposals for reduction of ballooning inventories while the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs (CCEA) has endorsed them. The status quo remains.
Another dampener is that the policy initiative for export of 2 mt of wheat at $300/tonne freight-on-board is bound to fail with the price pegged at approximately 20%, or $60/tonne, above the tradeable value. Not a cent more is ever paid in the fiercely competitive international market. This is mirrored by the fact that attempts in July this year to dispose 8 mt of wheat, including three old stocks (2011-12) at R15,000/tonne in the domestic market (ex-Punjab, Haryana) came a cropper.
Hesitant food ministry?
On August 9, CCEA approved the disposal of 2 mt of wheat through exports at around $300/tonne fob.
Three PSUs under the commerce ministry issued tenders for only 1,60,000 tonnes on September 12, due on October 4, to be kept valid for acceptance till October 14. November 15 has been fixed as the deadline for shipment. Actual shipments could spillover to December—five months shall lapse between announcement of disposal and encashing of such a limited tonnage. Import tenders for 1 mt of urea are wrapped up in less than a week by these very PSUs in consultation with the fertiliser ministry where similar guidelines are applicable. This lethargy gives the impression that the food ministry is hesitant in destocking even though FCI has the capability to procure about 30 mt of wheat in less than 2 months.
Phony export pricing
Unless the food ministry decides to export at the current international parity of $240-250/tonne fob (R16,000), even this exercise of limited volume may prove futile. The value realisation at a price of R16,000/tonne is reasonable, given the Open Market Sale Scheme (OMSS) quote of R15,000/tonne. Let us consider the arguments often given to justify for pricing wheat at MEP of $300/tonne fob (R19,200): Indian wheat is better, so it should fetch more realisation than those of other origins; the market price can’t be assessed; there is a need to determine price with transparency; the market is going to move up; and India has already sold wheat at $300-310/tonne fob. These arguments stem from a mindset of ignorance and isolation from any conception of how commodities are traded. These justifications of the price setting would fly in the face of the following counter arguments. Indian wheat carries much higher quantities of foreign matter in the form of stones, dust, rags, dead pests, etc, thanks to sub-standard storage practices. This requires that prices be correspondingly discounted from that being quoted for wheat of competing origins (Russia/Ukraine). Thus, value realisation above mark-to-market rates defies rationality. If the officialdom is unaware of internationally traded values and futures exchanges, then it should have little right fixing the price at $300/tonne fob. It needs to hire a competent consultancy.
Coming to price transparency argument, it is important to note that a price transparency seen in, say, August will not be applicable in, say, October. Also, any expectation of markets moving up is speculative. Business has to be done at the value tendered, not imagined. Else, the government will end up carrying foodgrains at the cost of the taxpayer—for storing and managing 40 mt, extra cost of $800 million is incurred in two years.
Domestic disposal?
Domestic tenders for sale of wheat to bulk users (ex-Punjab/Haryana) opened by FCI in end-July drew quotes for only 7,000 tonnes (note, only quotes). One of the reasons for the poor response is overpriced (floor price of R15,000/tonne plus taxes) new and old (2011-12 stocks) grains in cover-and-plinth storages to be collected on a “as is where is” basis. Most of these depots were at locations with no rail connectivity. The payment had to be up front. This adds up to an ex-depot cost of R16,000/tonne, while good quality, new crop is trading at R15,000 ex-UP with negotiable credit terms. Thus, the cost of dealing with government regulations pushes up costs for traders.
In March-April this year, the government offered 1 mt of wheat for export to private players at the OMMS price of R14,840/tonne for old crop from Punjab and Haryana. This translated to an fob cost of $320/tonne versus a tradeable value of $290. Thus, tenders were issued and closed without any worthwhile disposal.
The remedy
First, for wheat export, shorten bidding and decision-making period to one week for better price realisation; price wheat on mark-to-market basis as per best offers received. Sell forward for October, November, December, and so on at 7,00,000 tonnes a month from multiple ports on the east and west coasts as was done last year. Old wheat can be ‘assessed’ on the basis of MSP in FY12 with lower quality parameters or at $20/tonne less than that for milling quality. Second, wheat for domestic consumption/bulk buyers/traders/roller flour millers may be priced for delivery at R15000/tonne in all states. Such a policy was followed between 2000 and 2004—domestic tenders were dispensed. This will mitigate wheat inflation and grains will move from Punjab/Haryana to other states. Third, create a policy for selling excess rice in local market at R20,000/tonne. Large volumes can be offloaded at this price and carrying cost can be economised. Fourth, the food ministry merits a performance audit immediately.
The author is a grains trade analyst. Views are personal
SOURCE: http://archive.financialexpress.com/news/a-grainy-vision-for-food-surplus/1173653/0

Monday, September 23, 2013

ARTICLE : ‘GM Crops Won’t Solve India’s Food Crisis’

9:00 am IST Sep 22, 2013 By Shanoor Seervai      

Economy & Business | The Wall Street Journal

Earlier this month, India’s Parliament passed a bill aimed at delivering subsidized food to around 800 million people. While well-intentioned, the law is expensive and has raised questions about whether India produces enough food to meet demand.
 
Proponents of genetically modified food say GM technology will boost production to meet India’s food requirements, but critics argue that it is unsustainable, and that the main challenge is not one of production but distribution.

Dilnavaz Variava doesn’t believe that GM food will address India’s food crisis. She is honorary convener for consumer issues for the Alliance for Sustainable and Holistic Agriculture, an alliance of farmers, scientists, economists, non-governmental organizations and citizens who advocate for ecologically and economically sustainable agriculture.

Ms. Variava has worked for a range of organizations, including the World Wildlife Fund India, where she was chief executive, and the Bombay Natural History Society. She has also served on several federal government committees as well as one in Maharashtra for the development of agriculture.

Ms. Variava spoke with The Wall Street Journal’s India Real Time about GM food in India. Edited excerpts:

The Wall Street Journal: Parliament’s passage of the Food Security Bill reflects the urgency of addressing the food security challenge. Would genetically modified food do this?
Dilnavaz Variava: India has enough food grain — almost two-and-a-half times the required buffer stock — and yet 200 million Indians go hungry. The problem of sufficiency is not one of production, but of economic and physical access, which the Food Security Bill attempts to address. Poverty, mounds of rotting food grain, wastage and leakages in the Public Distribution System are the real causes of food insecurity. GM food cannot address this.

WSJ: Is there evidence from other countries that GM food improves food security?
Ms. Variava: Macroeconomic data for the largest adopters of GM food indicate the opposite. In the U.S., food insecurity has risen from 12% in pre-GM 1995 to 15% in 2011. In Paraguay, where nearly 65% of land is under GM crops, hunger increased from 12.6% in 2004-06 to 25.5% in 2010-12. In Brazil and Argentina, GM food has not reduced hunger. In any event, GM does not increase yields, as the Union of Concerned Scientists established through a review of 12 years of GM in the U.S.

WSJ: How does GM food differ in quality from non-GM food?
Ms. Variava: About 99% of all GM crops have either one or both of two traits that make food unsafe: a pesticide-producing toxin (Bt) present in every cell of the plant and a herbicide tolerant trait that enables the plant to withstand herbicides used to kill weeds. While food safety regulators have cleared GM foods as safe, many independent scientists disagree. Their studies point to health risks: allergies, cancer, reproductive, renal, pancreatic and hepatic disorders. They say regulators give safety assurances based on studies which the GM industry conducts for a maximum period of 90 days on lab rats. This corresponds to a human life span of less than 15 years, which is too short for long-term health effects such as organ damage or cancer to manifest.

WSJ: In India, why did the Supreme Court-appointed Technical Expert Committee call for a moratorium on field trials of GM crops in July?
Ms. Variava: The TEC majority report by five scientists from the fields of molecular biology, toxicology, nutrition science and biodiversity called for an indefinite moratorium on field trials, stating that ‘the regulatory system has major gaps.’ They concluded that the quality of information in several GM applications was far below that necessary for rigorous evaluation. They recommended a moratorium on field trials for Bt in food crops until there was more definitive information on its long-term safety, and for crops for which India is a center of origin/diversity. They also recommended a ban on the release of ‘herbicide tolerant’ crops, which are inadvisable on socioeconomic grounds in a country where farms are small and weeding provides income to millions of people.

WSJ: Does the report take food security into account?
Ms. Variava: Yes, the report notes that although India has a food surplus in production terms, one-third of the world’s malnourished children live here. It does not see GM as the answer to this.

WSJ: Does it make sense to ban even field trials of GM food?
Ms. Variava: Field trials involve open-air releases of GM. Given that rice and wheat survived their supposed destruction after field trials in U.S. and caused import bans leading to losses of millions of dollars to U.S. farmers, field trials are not harmless scientific experiments. Banning field trials makes sense until a strong biosafety and liability regime is in place.

WSJ: Isn’t India taking regulatory steps to promote the safe use of modern biotechnology, for example with the proposed Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India Bill?
Ms. Variava: The BRAI Bill appears to be promoting rather than regulating GM. It proposes a single window clearance, with power to clear GM crops dangerously concentrated in the hands of just five people. All its other committees are merely advisory. It will overrule the constitutional powers of state governments over agriculture and circumscribe the Right to Information and legal redressal. It does not mandate long-term studies, assure labeling and post-release health monitoring, or have adequate punitive provisions. There is no mandatory consideration of safer alternatives or preliminary need assessment based on socioeconomic factors. GM crops are input intensive, requiring adequate fertilizers and timely irrigation. With over 70% of India’s farmers being small and impoverished, and 65% dependent on the vagaries of the monsoon, GM is a high cost, high debt and high risk technology for India. The BRAI Bill does not ensure caution for this unpredictable and irreversible technology.

WSJ: What would economically and environmentally sustainable agriculture for India look like?
Ms. Variava: A World Bank commissioned study found that agro-ecological approaches and not GM provide the best solution to the world’s food crisis.In March 2011, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food also reported that small scale farmers could double food production within 5 to 10 years by agro-ecological farming.

An Associated Chambers of Commerce and Industry of India study for West Bengal found that organic farming could increase net per capita income of a farmer in the state by 250%, lead to wealth accumulation of 120 billion rupees ($1.9 billion), generate exports worth 5.5 billion rupees ($87 million) and create nearly two million employment opportunities over five years.

In Andhra Pradesh, Community Managed Sustainable Agriculture was started in 2005-06. It promoted ecologically and economically sound agriculture with state government and World Bank support. About 10,000 villages with one million farmers practice non-pesticidal management on over 3.5 million acres. Pesticide use in the state has decreased by more than 45%. Net income increases were 3,000 to 15,000 rupees per acre, in addition to meeting a household’s food needs.
Shanoor Seervai is a freelance writer based in Bombay. Like India Real Time on Facebook here and follow us on Twitter @WSJIndia.

SOURCE : http://blogs.wsj.com/indiarealtime/2013/09/22/gm-crops-wont-solve-indias-food-crisis/tab/comments/

Wednesday, September 4, 2013

Desi cotton set for a revival

Ananda Teertha Pyati, September 3, 2013, DHNS:

Agriculture
breeding HOPE (Above) Farmer Nagappa Nimbegondi proudly shows off a traditional cotton  variety grown in his field. (Top right) A traditional variety of the Punjab Cotton is used to weave Khadi and is being cultivated for hundreds of years. A farmer in Haveri district has now begun growing this variety in Karnataka. (Far right) The tree cotton variety, which has naturally pink coloured strains, is found to grow in Karnataka along with the the Jowar Tapi (Photos by the author)
Traditional Indian cotton varieties have gradually ceded ground to their American counterpart after Independence. Now, a movement is on to bring them back and solve the food security issue plaguing farmers, says Ananda Teertha Pyati.
Most farmers stand in queue to get hybrid cotton seeds for sowing, but Nagappa Nimbegondi of Makari village in Haveri district doesn’t bother. He sows desi (traditional) seeds. Nowadays, local varieties of seeds are getting popular and thousands of farmers have been sowing them. But Nagappa has something more to offer: the farmer has cultivated more than 20 varieties of desi cotton seeds!

For the past three years, desi cotton varieties are growing in his field, each variety being unique in nature and quality. A few decades ago, cotton was grown along with other food crops in the mixed crop system. As a result of the Green Revolution, hybrid varieties replaced the local ones and farmers began growing cotton as a single crop.

When India got Independence, 97 per cent of the total cultivation was of desi varieties. Known for their short staple characteristic, these varieties were most popular in Europe. After Independence, however, farmers were convinced to grow American varieties which have the long staple characteristic. Gradually, desi varieties disappeared from the fields of Indian farmers with hybrids and Bt cotton replacing them in a very short time. During 1990, the area of cultivation of desi cotton was 42 per cent out of the total cotton farming which came down to 28 per cent in 2000. This year, the cultivation has reached an abysmal low of three per cent!

The desi varieties have ceded ground to the American varieties and now the situation is exactly the reverse, compared to that of 1947. 

Apart from general uses like textile, jeans, tea-coffee filters, fishing nets etc., Indian desi cotton is famous for its medicinal use. During surgical treatments, absorbent cotton is a must and Indian desi cotton is considered the best among other cotton varieties in the world. The demand for absorbent cotton is increasing and the USA, Japan and European countries import huge quantities of cotton. 

India can a play major role in this sector as its varieties fulfill all requirements. “Many varieties have resistance to pest and disease and some can be grown with little rain and are suitable for dryland farming. Apart from these qualities, they were growing along with food crops like red gram, chilli and safflower under the Akkadi system (mixed crop) where the farmers grow food, oil and edible oil crops besides commercial crops, thus securing a measure of food security. But now cotton is growing under the mono crop method and if the crop failed, farmer has to suffer solely”, points out G Krishnaprasad, coordinator of the desi cotton conservation movement.

The movement is a farmers’ initiative towards conservation of the traditional varities of cotton seeds. The movement was started by some interested organic farmers from different parts of Karnataka, whose main objective is to conserve desi varieties. These farmers from different regions came together four years ago and discussed the issue. They discovered that except the ‘Jayadhara’ variety, there were hardly any other variety of seeds available in Karnataka. Then some organisations working in different states sent seeds available in those regions. 

Pioneering effort

It was decided to multiply (producing) seeds and the responsibility was given to Nagappa Nimbegondi. 

In the last few years, he has grown 24 varieties, producing seeds and giving them to other farmers. Many farmers have now come forward to cultivate these varieties. “During the first year we were able to get only three varieties and subsequently we got 10. Now, in the third year the collection has reached 24. Unfortunately,  the Central Institution for Cotton Research located at Nagpur has also failed to document and collect desi cotton varieties. But somehow, with like-minded organisations, we got these seeds,” explains Krishnaprasad.

Desi cotton is also used in making dolls, non-allergic cloth materials, baby dresses etc. Now more than a hundred of farmers have come forward to cultivate these varieties and Chennai’s ‘Natures Store’ has agreed to buy the produce. Under its Eco Fab project, the group purchases cotton threads and makes clothes and other materials. The Agricultural Research Station at Hulakoti has decided to grow several varieties in a demonstration plot for the benefit of farmers. During their harvesting period, an analysis of crop and characterisation of all varieties will be done by the scientists.

Cotton has become a major commercial crop instead of a component in the mixed cropping system, thanks to the Green Revolution which made this crop dependant on chemical fertilisers. 

However, the effort to get back desi cotton into the farmer’s field has begun in Karnataka. “These varieties neither need chemical inputs nor much water. They could grow along with food crops and this system must be revived in terms of food security to the farmer’s family. Agricultural research Institutes should motivate farmers in this way,” urges Krishnaprasad.

Jayadhar, Pandharapur and tree cotton of Karnataka; Pondru of Andhra; Magad and Kaala cotton of Gujarat; Bengal Desi from Rajasthan and Seranum of Meghalaya are some among the desi varieties, which have been in farmers’ field since hundreds of years.
A traditional variety of Punjab Cotton is said to be used for Khaadi cloth which is still cultivated in that state by a few farmers. Another farmer of Makari village, Shivayogi has sown the seeds of this variety in his field. “If a systematic search is done, we can get many more special varieties like these”, points out Shivayogi.
Source: http://www.deccanherald.com/content/354861/desi-cotton-set-revival.html

Sunday, September 1, 2013

A WONDER FARM IN KERALA

Shree Padre, Kozhikode
Dubai’s agriculture minister recently chartered a flight to Kozhikode and, accompanied by a horticulture consultant, headed to the Agriculture Research Station (ARS) at Anakkayam nearby. There the minister, Abdulla Jassim Abdulla M Almarzooqi, placed orders for fruits, spices and ornamental plants. But on his mind was something bigger. He offered free visas and air tickets to the 100 members of the research station’s agricultural army, which rather grandly goes by the name of Hi-tech Karshika Karma Sena (HTKKS). 
What is so special about the Annakayam ARS that the Dubai minister should have felt the need to fly down to it?
Since 2007, this research station has gone from being a sleepy government facility to an engine of innovative agricultural practices – some local, some with far-reaching implications. Much of the credit for this energy and vision goes to Prasanna Rajendran, 53, who heads the ARS with the designation of assistant director of research.
Rajendran’s success has been such that the ARS’s annual income is Rs 2.56 crores. For next year, it has set a target of Rs 3 crores.
Compare that to Kerala Agriculture University (KAU) which earns Rs 8 crores annually from 3,500 acres. The ARS with just 25 acres adds Rs 2.56 crores to the KAU’s kitty.  
What has led to this transformation? Rajendran attributes it to “just a little common sense and team work”. He adds: “Whatever we’ve done here is possible in any other research institution.” 
Started in 1963, the Anakkayam ARS was once a cashew research station with 25 acres of rain-fed dryland. Only one scientist and five labourers worked here. Every summer, drinking water had to fetched from outside. The station’s annual revenue was a paltry Rs 4.92 lakhs. It had been all but written off.
Today ARS trains youth in agriculture, works with self-help groups (SHGs) and produces a variety of fruits and vegetables, some of which are processed and sold.
The turnaround: Before Rajendran took over, the station only had some cashew trees. It had no water, no crops, no staff and not enough buildings. Rajendran quickly figured out that he needed more hands.
So, his first priority was to train a band of people. A six-month Vocational Higher Secondary (VHS) course in agriculture was launched. In an unusual move, this course was conducted only during holidays. After six months of training, a team was ready, but it had to register itself because only a registered team could be given work under government rules.
The station then entered into a profit-sharing work agreement with the team thus created. Rajendran says: “For the ‘holiday training’ we didn’t claim any remuneration despite being entitled to it. This and the profit-sharing model on which our SHGs were later offered work set the ball rolling. The result has been unbelievable.”
Malappuram district gets 2,900 mm of rainfall in a year. This adds up to 10 million litres per acre. One by one, the station built three huge bottom-lined rain ponds, each with a capacity of five million litres. Initially, they made the run-off from the sloping land fill these ponds after filtering. Now that there is enough water, the practice has been discontinued. The ponds store a minimum of 10 million litres of rainwater, enough to irrigate 25 acres. Says Rajendran: “For many short duration crops, this much irrigation is enough to double yields.”
Field management was the next priority. Weeds had grown in the whole area. The new team was pressed into service. The biomass obtained was huge. Simple vermicompost units were built. Now the station produces about 500 tonnes of vermicompost every year. This is sufficient for all the organic manure requirements of the farm. Whatever is left over – about 100 tonnes – is sold.
“With the wild weeds gone, the campus acquired a new look. Visitors started arriving. The station began to get one project after another. Funds too started pouring in,” says Rajendran.
Local farmers in the past mocked the ARS as a ‘cashew factory’. But now the ARS is back to being an agriculture research station. It has a tissue culture lab and a processing centre apart from a huge amount of vegetable seeds and planting material. Even during the non-planting season 50 farmers on an average visit the station to buy planting material or seek expert advice.
Says Rajendran, “During the rains, we now have 250 workers, including temporary labourers. But even this is not adequate because our activities are so diverse. Our total expenditure, including salaries, would be less than Rs 1 crore. So ours is the only ARS under KAU that doesn’t have financial constraints.”
What makes the achievements of this research station all the more remarkable is its sparse infrastructure.  Its canteen is makeshift. The campus has no guest house. The processing lab is cramped and lacks minimum facilities. The tissue culture lab is no better. Rajendran and his team carry on regardless.
“The Anakkayam panchayat had 250 families without an income,” explains Rajendran, “We roped them in as contract labourers. These women now earn Rs 200 per day.” They have been formed into SHGs of seven to eight members each.
Plant money: Nursery plant propagation in the profit-sharing model has been extremely successful. Anakkayam station now produces plants in a two-hectare space. From fruits and ornamental plants to vegetable seedlings in nursery trays, the station produces a remarkable variety.
During the planting season, some SHGs produce up to 100,000 plants in a month. The minimum price for any plant is Rs 10. So the sale value of 100,000 plants is `10 lakhs. The SHG gets Rs 3.5 lakhs as its share. Invoicing is done in a phased manner so that these workers get good returns even during the lean season.
Local farmers are now accustomed to using vegetable seedlings grown in nursery trays. The station keeps some fast-moving seedlings like tomato, brinjal, chillies and bitter gourd ready. These are sold at Rs 2 per seedling.
The business of producing vegetable seedlings in nursery trays on specific orders is thriving. Farmers and panchayats place specific indents. There is growing demand for bhindi and cowpea seedlings too.
Says farm manager Shahida: “We produce cabbage and cauliflower seedlings too. Farmers from Gundlupete across the Karnataka border and some from distant Tamil Nadu also come here to buy these.” This ARS produces approximately 400,000 vegetable seedlings a year. “Marketing of planting material is not a problem. Actually we are meeting less than 50 per cent of the demand.”
The station has developed an orchard of 57 different jackfruit saplings for cloning. Interesting varieties among these are seedless jack, Chingam varikka and Pallipuram varikka. But this orchard is yet to be evaluated.
Pointing to a strange-looking fruit-cum-vegetable, Rajendran says: “This is horned melon (kiwano) that we got through a pilot friend some years ago. It was brought from California. Its juice is very refreshing. The oil extracted from its seeds is expensive. It grows in three months and performs well in our conditions. We’ve distributed the seeds to hundreds of farmers.”
Kokum from Konkan is also being popularised. This multipurpose, medicinal fruit plant is very rare in this part of Kerala. It is ideal for making squash, jam and wine. In the last year, the ARS has sold 1,000 grafts and earned Rs 40,000 from the one mother tree they have. “Demand for these grafts has increased 10-fold,” says a farm hand.
The ARS is now gearing up for its ninth batch of trained people. The first and second batches were fully absorbed in the ARS itself. All members of the third batch got admission in B.Sc. (Agriculture). Subsequent trainees were well placed or got a chance to study further. More and more young people are being drawn towards this six-month course.
A hi-tech army: Another scalable model the ARS  has created is the training of the agricultural army. There is a message in calling it “Hi-tech”. It consists of 100 people between 25 and 40 years old. Some have only completed school. Others have college degrees. They learn about grafting and tissue culture among other things. They also develop skills with regard to precision farming, which is installation and maintenance of poly houses, green houses and rain shelters, designing and setting up terrace gardens.
They are trained in putting up protected cultivation structures, value addition of vegetables, fruits and spices through processing and the creation of rainwater harvesting structures for irrigation support and fishing.
The HTKKS is just six months old but is already making a mark. All the 100 trained members are not required in all projects. They are enlisted according to the nature of a project. HTKKS team leader Abdul Salam says: “We have completed 13 poly houses and green houses so far. Our activities have spread to neighbouring districts and beyond. Nine more projects are pending. Inquiries are pouring in. Recently we got one from Gujarat too.”

Skills & jobs: Most team members make up to Rs 20,000 per month. They have made the flooring of the training hall and the roof of the processing centre. The canteen has been constructed by them. How have they accomplished all this? “We have one or two members who know welding, masonry and other such skills. It is under their guidance that all the others worked. We are learning new skills every day,” explains Abdul Salam.
Under government rules, open tenders are required. The HTKKS bids for work and quotations are much lower. “For a 1000 square  metre poly house, construction tenders of up to Rs 14 lakhs were received. HTKKS quoted `9 lakhs and bagged the contract.”
However, some trained members have left HTKKS. “A few think in terms of themselves and their work hours. They are the ones that have left,” says Salam, “but there have been only a few.”
Abdul Nissar, another team leader, says: “All other professions have gone high tech. Farming is an exception. Poly house cultivation and precision farming are really ideal to attract young people to farming.”
“Most Kerala youngsters dream of a job in the Gulf,” says Rajendran. “I worked in Saudi Arabia for many years. If we can work hard there, why not here in India? Here we can earn better and enjoy more advantages too.”
The Kerala state agriculture department is running a vegetable development scheme in the district. The total cost of raising a kitchen garden is Rs 2,000. A family has to pay Rs 500. The rest is given in material form as subsidy. Vegetable seedlings are delivered to the doorsteps of the beneficiary farmer in grow bags. The farmer has to simply irrigate, manure and take care of the plant. The target in the district is 10,000 families. But the ARS has already received more applications than that.
 
Fruit products: An old building has been converted into a food- processing unit. The facilities are very rudimentary. But every day a group of women here produces pickles, jams and squashes. Apart from jackfruit, many local minor fruits are used. Banana rhizome pickle is probably the most innovative product. Kerala grows Nendran banana in a big way. After harvesting, the rhizome is incorporated into the soil. Pickle from this is an instant success with customers. ARS sells it for Rs 15 per 100 gm.
Says Rajendran: “This is alkaline and good for people suffering from stomach ulcers. Of course, we source only organically grown raw material – because in Nendran cultivation a considerable amount of pesticides is used.”
Another interesting product from the Kerala perspective is green mango squash. Wild and green mangoes are usually available in the market for Rs 4 to Rs 5 a kg. Squash made from this has many takers.
Rajendran is hopeful that if someone shows farmers ways of earning more money from the banana tree, they would really do away with the pesticides. “Now they use toxic pesticides because they are anxious that a crop should be bountiful. If they are convinced that they can also earn from rhizome, they would bid goodbye to chemical cultivation. Banana byproduct utilization could come to the rescue of farmers if promoted in a proper way.”
Merchants and exporters, too, come to the station to buy food products. They have purchased value-added products worth Rs 50,000 in the last month alone. An exporter recently bought dry products (like tapioca dehydrated) worth Rs 27,000 to export it to the Middle-East.
In order to encourage women to utilise local fruits for income generation, the station offers free training. Training has already been imparted in making products from fruits like gooseberry, carambola, bilimbi and wild mango. However success has been slow. “Rigid registration and licensing rules prevent setting up of production units”, says Rajendran, “But now, there is hope. FPO Licensing has been recently decentralised to panchayat level.”
The processing facility of the station is just one year old. The time does not seem ripe for the women to switch over to the profit-sharing model. Until their production reaches a level, these women will be paid daily wages.

Homely vegetables: For the last three years, the ARS is in the forefront of poly house vegetable cultivation. “In a poly house vegetable production can be enhanced five to 10 times,” says Rajendran.
He lists the benefits of poly houses. “The vegetables are of much better quality with less or no pesticide load. There is very little labour required and less water is needed. Production is year round.”
At present, this ARS has 5,000 square metres of poly houses. It catches rain from half of the roof area of its poly houses. In Malappuram, there are three state-level award-winning farmers carrying out farming in poly houses. Cost is a deterrent in poly house farming. It works out to Rs 1,000 to Rs 1,200 per square metre, including cost of cultivation. Yet, ARS has already influenced a few dozen farmers to take up poly house vegetable cultivation.
The Kerala government has introduced a scheme to provide poly houses of 400 square metres. “This is not sufficient,” says Rajendran. A farmer should have a minimum of 1,000 square metres to be commercially viable.” The Kerala government plans to give 75 per cent subsidy to three farmers in each panchayat to build poly houses. Approximately four years would be required for breaking even.
Food for landless: The ARS has designed an easy and innovative way for the landless poor to cultivate vegetables. This is called the Semi Permanent Tower (SPT) for vegetable cultivation. This method enables people to grow vegetables inside or near the kitchen or on a flat roof terrace throughout the year. “In a single bag we can accommodate 30 to 32 vegetable plants by growing upwards,” Rajendran explains. “This method is ideal for growing leafy vegetables and greens, including curry leaf, without applying any pesticide”.
The structure looks like a barrel. A pipe is introduced vertically at the centre. The growing medium is filled inside. Nutrients can be supplemented as foliar sprays. It is enough if the tower is watered once in 15 days.
At present the station has three models for this method. An SPT made of gunny-bag costs Rs 200. If made from fibre, it costs Rs 800. A permanent plant costs Rs 2,000. “Design and material can be changed or fine-tuned. But this model is many times better than grow bags,” says Rajendran.  
Outsourcing of vegetable seed production through SHGs started here four years ago. In the first year, there were 22 participating farmers. Now the number has gone up to 89 and spread to neighbouring districts like Kozhikode, Palakkad and Wayanad. In all 3.5 tonnes of seeds worth Rs 40 lakhs were produced last year. The ARS buys vegetables and not seeds from these farmers. “This is to prevent any chances of mixing up the seeds.”
A very successful case is that of Moideen, a farmer from Kozhikode district. On three acres of a new rubber plantation he planted banana and pumpkin. He has sold his entire crop and improved his annual income.
Citing examples like this one, Rajendran says, “With proper planning, poverty can be eradicated in farming.”

What others say: “Dr Rajendran has vision,” says Kerala agriculture minister K.P. Mohanan. It is not easy to instill the institutional spirit in casual workers, that too in Kerala. What is the secret of this scientist’s success? “Man is a social animal. We have to take care of the people who work with us,” he replies.
One such move started four years ago. Every year the entire staff is taken on a one-day tour. Places visited so far are Ooty, Munnar, Ambalavayal Farm, Nelliambudi and Coorg. Says Rajendran: “We travel a lot. It offers a break from routine.”
Five hearing impaired people work here. They earn `6,000 per month. Three of them are from afar and stay in rented rooms. “We have to get more and more challenged people into the mainstream. They are very creative. This work helps them grow as individuals. We call this process horti-therapy.” 
Rajendran is a workaholic. Though a government officer, he isn’t a 10 am to 5 pm guy. He is often in the office on Sundays too. “My teammates are also like that. Nobody complains about a few extra hours. If there is urgency, they are ready to work on holidays,” he reveals.
When Rajendran first arrived here, the pathetic state of the station drove him to despair. “In the early days I even thought of taking voluntary retirement,” he says. But he has kept all negativity at bay ever since.
For several years this ARS had only one scientist. Six months ago, Dr Mustafa Kunnathady, an agronomist, joined the staff. “Other KAU institutes have more space and machinery. But whatever we have is put to very good use. Yes, the shortage of scientists does affect research work,” says Rajendran.
Dr P. Rajendran, KAU vice-chancellor, says: “Anakkayam ARS can be confidently presented as a model institution. The way in which it utilises organic waste is outstanding. KAU has 26 research stations.   We will incorporate the Anakkayam lessons in all these stations.”
 
A bigger experiment: When we visited the ARS, it was celebrating its 50th year. Two ambitious projects are on. An agro-tourism centre costing Rs 7.3 crores has been sanctioned on its premises. Apart from adding a guest house and an international hostel, the station would expose visitors to local farming systems. The process to adopt Thuvvur in Eranad taluk to make it a ‘model agricultural village of Kerala” is also on.
A month ago, Rajendran was given additional charge of the Regional Agriculture Research Station of Ambalavayal in the backward district of Wayanad. Both Anakkayam and Ambalavayal are in remote areas and are understaffed. In Ambalavayal, for the existing 15 posts present, there are only two scientists. Anakkayam, which is supposed to have five scientists, has only one scientist apart from Rajendran.
Despite the ARS’s impressive revenue generation, Rajendran is not satisfied. He says: “At Anakkayam, with all these development measures and diversified activities, we are still utilising only 25 per cent of resources. There are many limitations. But I am confident that we can generate Rs 10 crores here annually. In the case of Ambalavayal, where I took charge 15 days ago, only 5 per cent of resources are being utilised.”
For instance, Ambalavayal ARS has more than 10,000 jackfruit trees. Though they are pruned, their yield is medium. At present, the fruits are auctioned for a pittance of Rs 20,000 to Rs 5,000 “No more auctioning of jackfruit,” Rajendran says. He has decided to upgrade its jackfruit pulping capacity. As a first move the processing unit staff would be sent to Kudal in Maharashtra, for training in jackfruit pulping.
After he took charge at Ambalavayal, Rajendran convened a meeting of the panchayat president and representatives of all SHGs. In all 390 SHG members attended. “Those of you who register their names in a week will get employment opportunities that will fetch you a decent income,” the SHGs were told. Without delay, 390 SHGs registered. “Each SHG has about 10 members. We will now have 3,900 pairs of hands that are prepared to work with us,” says Rajendran.
He adds: “At the Anakkayam ARS, on 25 acres 250 people are given direct employment. If the same systems are adopted in Wayanad, employment can be given to 2,000 to 3,000 people. A 10-fold development is possible there. If God permits, we will do better in Wayanad.”

Contact Dr Rajendran at: arsanakkayam@kau.in, + 91 94471 86158