Thursday, February 4, 2016

Press Statement by AIKS on GM Mustard

All India Kisan Sabha
36 Canning Lane, New Delhi-1

Press Statement                               4th February, 2016

AIKS notes with concern that the Minister of Environment and Forests is pursuing aggressively for commercial release of GM Mustard without carrying out stringent Bio-Safety tests. The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee is meeting on 5th February to take a decision on the matter. It is to be noted that there is no stringent fool-proof regulatory regime to look into transgenics and possible impact on Bio-Safety and Bio-Diversity.
 
AIKS is strongly of the opinion that the Bio-Safety implying safety for humans, animals and environment as well as Bio-Diversity cannot be compromised. We demand that all data be put in the public domain for independent scientific scrutiny. Unless and until a broad-based regulatory body equipped to make stringent long-term tests in a fool-proof manner is in place no approval for new varieties should be allowed. AIKS deplores the practice of allowing public sector research to be used for profiteering by seed monopolies.
 
In the context of the experience of Bt Cotton in which Seed Monopolies are fleecing Farmers with high prices and raking in super profits, we have seen that even when Governments have decided to control prices they have refused to adhere to such decisions. This year lakhs of cotton farmers suffered due to whitefly and pink bollworm attack while the seed companies are going scot-free without being made accountable for the losses. AIKS calls upon the Ministry of Environment and Forests to put on hold the GEAC meeting to decide on GM Mustard and instead make serious efforts towards the setting up of an effective regulatory mechanism and also a Legislation to fix liability of Seed Monopolies. In the absence of these measures AIKS will resist imposition of GM Mustard. AIKS calls upon all its units to remain vigilant and protest against such moves by the Government.
 
Amra Ram                                                                                         Hannan Mollah
President                                                                                           General Secretary

PRESS RELEASE by La Via Campesina, South Asia

NEWS: Farmers’ body asks government to put GM mustard on hold

PTI | Feb 4, 2016, 06.41 PM IST
NEW DELHI: Expressing concern over Narendra Modi government's push for genetically modified mustard, a farmers' front on Thursday asked the Centre to float an "effective" regulatory mechanism to look into the crop's possible impact on biosafety and biodiversity.

All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS), a farmers' wing of CPM, also asked the government to put on hold its meeting on Friday with Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), which is going to take a call on the GM mustard crop.

"AIKS calls upon the environment and forest ministry to put on hold the GEAC meeting and instead make serious efforts towards setting up an effective regulatory mechanism to look into transgenic and possible impact on biosafety and biodiversity," the AIKS said in a statement.

SOURCE:

NEWS : GEAC to hold second meeting on GM mustard tomorrow

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi February 4, 2016 Last Updated at 20:48 IS T   
Biotechnology regulator GEAC is holding a second meeting tomorrow to discuss the much-debated genetically modified (GM) mustard seed issue despite strong opposition. 

The Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) had met once last month to hear views of the technology developer Deepak Pental, a scientist at the DelhiUniversity. Later, a sub-panel of GEAC had met on February 2 on the matter. 

The Environment Ministry has received a proposal for commercial cultivation of a GM hybrid variety of the mustard plant developed by the university's Centre for Genetic Manipulation of Crop Plants (CGMCP). 

"The second meeting of GEAC is scheduled for tomorrow. The meeting will listen to the views of the sub-committee on the GM mustard proposal," sources said. 

Anti-GM farmer union bodies, including Bhartiya Kisan Sangh (BKS), have been demanding to cancel such meetings on the issue. 

"Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar is allowing GEAC to hold its meeting to process the GM mustard application on Friday (February 5). It makes us wonder what and wherefrom the need and pressure are emerging from," said a joint statement issued by 13 farmer unions yesterday. 

They had said the meeting has been scheduled despite opposition to the GM mustard from major crop-growing states, including BJP-rules ones. 

Besides the farmers' unions, there is stiff opposition from NGOs against GM mustard, which is seen to jeopardise traditional varieties and leave farmers dependent solely on private companies for such seeds. 

Former Union health minister Anbumani Ramadoss and several farmer groups such as Bhartiya Kisan Union, Bhartiya Kisan Sangh and the Right to Food Campaign have made representations to the government opposing GM mustard. 

Biotechnology industry body ABLE-AG is of the view that the regulator, GEAC, should at least be allowed to do a scientific review of the technology before firming up its mind. 

According to ABLE-AG, GM mustard -- which has the potential of increasing yield by 25 per cent -- is required in India as the country is still dependent on edible oil imports. India's rapeseed-mustard seed production stood at 63.09 lakh tonnes in 2014-15 crop year (July-June). 

This is the first proposal that has come up before the NDA government after the previous government had put a moratorium on commercial cultivation of Bt Brinjal in 2010. Currently, Bt cotton is the only GM crop allowed for commercialisation.

SOURCE:
http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/geac-to-hold-second-meeting-on-gm-mustard-tomorrow-116020401351_1.html

NEWS : JD(U) writes to PM Modi against GM mustard crop

Party general secretary K C Tyagi urged the prime minister "not to give consent" to introduction of genetically modified mustard crops

Press Trust of India  |  New Delhi February 4, 2016 Last Updated at 19:57 IST
The chorus of protest against GM mustard today grew louder, with JD(U) today writing to Prime MinisterNarendra Modi seeking cancellation of tomorrow's meeting of Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee called to decide the fate of GM crops.

Holding that all mustard producing states are opposing this move of the government, party general secretary K C Tyagi reminded Modi that Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar has already written to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar urging him to make consulting the states and obtaining their consent mandatory for any kind of field trial.

Talking to PTI, Tyagi said his party would like to take all-like minded parties on board on the issue and could also raise it in the upcoming Budget Session, if the government did not pay head to the demands for dropping the idea.

Tyagi urged the prime minister "not to give consent" to introduction of genetically modified mustard crops and cancel the "pre-scheduled secret meeting" on the issue.

Claiming that "strong and collective voices against this secret meeting and the proposal to introduce GM cropsare being raised all over the nation", Tyagi said even developed countries like the US and China have avoided GM crops.

Maintaining that proposed introduction of GM mustard has created an "environment of fear" among farmers, Tyagi said, "More than 50 farmers organisations across the country have slammed the government's proposed move to introduce the banned GM crops.

"The Supreme Court has also demanded an explanation from the central government regarding the same. So as a people's representative, I would urge you to cancel the GEAC meeting."

JD(U) has raised the issue a day after RSS-affiliate Swadeshi Jagran Manch warned against grant of permission for commercial production of GM mustard.

Around 50 farmers unions including RSS-affliate Bharatiya Kisan Sangh yesterday expressed concern over the "secretive" process adopted by the government.

Tyagi also referred to objections raised a few days ago by Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, who had written a similar letter to the prime minister noting that approving commercial cultivation of GM mustard crops would "threaten" agriculture, farmers, health and environment.

In the letter, Sisodia had claimed scientists were conducting trials in this regard at Delhi University without Delhi government's 'no objection certificate', which he termed as "illegal", and asserted that Centre should have engaged the states in a dialogue on the issue.

Noting that Sisodia conveyed the Delhi government's opinion about the GM mustard, Tyagi said,"Not only this but organisations even from the BJP-ruled states have expressed their concern about the secretive processes adopted by the regulators.
 

NEWS : RSS Affiliate, Swadeshi Jagran Manch, Protests GM Mustard Commercialization Plan

NATIONAL

NEW DELHI, February 4, 2016
Updated: February 4, 2016 19:15 IST
 
The Swadeshi Jagran Manch- a social organisation affiliated to the Rashtriya Swayam Sevak Sangh-has condemned plans leading to possible commercialisation of genetically-modified mustard.
 
“Swadeshi Jagaran Manch reiterates its long pending demands:- a) No permission (be) granted for the commercial production of GM Mustard b) Data emanating from field trials conducted so far be made public so as to allow scientific analysis of the same,” says a letter by Ashwani Mahajan, National Convenor, SJM, to Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar. The note is available on the organisation’s website.
 
“We may repeat that GM technology is neither increasing the yield of the crops nor is it in any way decreasing the miseries of the farming community. On the other hand it enhances serious risks to the health of consumers as well as that of the soil. It also increases the cost of cultivation manifold, while transferring the same to corporate as immoral profits,” the note added. The organisation has previously objected to genetically-modified brinjal, that was cleared by the GEAC in 2010 but put on hold by then environment minister Jairam Ramesh.
 
The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC), which examines the scientific merits of releasing genetically modified seeds into the environment, will consider Friday making public the results of tests and studies so far conducted to test the safety of transgenic (or GM) mustard.
 
The organisation’s comments come even as several farmers’ groups and environmental activist organisations have protested the GEAC plans to allow GM mustard on farmer fields. “There is a scientific panel of experts that’s considering this … there is a lot of data but there are still some outstanding questions. We will take our time on this,” said a top official in the Ministry of Environment and Forests and Climate Change, requesting anonymity citing the sensitivity of the issue. The GEAC is constituted by the Environment Ministry.
 
A group of scientists, under the banner of GM Free India has also written to Javadekar Thursday condemning GM mustard. “There are many pending issues related to GM crops and their regulation in India - including examination of the entire biosafety assessment regime and its ability to actually protect India’s environment and citizens’ health from the risks of modern biotechnology - reeks of sinister motives that don’t favour ordinary citizens’ interests. We also understand that the current processes undertaken by the regulators are actually defying Supreme Court and Central Information Commission Orders in terms of transparency and independence of regulation.”
 

NEWS : Govt pushing GM food: Left


Our Bureau
Opposes commercialisation of mustard hybrid; court will decide says Javadekar
New Delhi, February 4:   
 
The Left parties and their affiliated unions have threatened protests against the perceived push the government is giving genetically modified (GM) mustard.

The protests follow reports about a scheduled meeting of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GMAC) on February 5 to decide on the commercialisation of Delhi University’s GM mustard hybrid DMH11.

CPI MP D Raja dashed off a letter to Environment Minister Prakash Javdekar demanding that before the GMAC considers environmental release of this Genetically Modified Organism (GMO), it should share relevant data in the public domain.

Javdekar, on his part, maintained that the matter would be decided by the court.
“The matter is already in the court. The court has given 15 days time to reply. We will reply in due course,” Javdekar told BusinessLine.

The CPI(M)-backed All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) accused the Ministry of Environment of pursuing the commercial release of this particular GMO without carrying out the necessary bio-safety tests. In a statement here, AIKS general secretary Hannan Mollah said the Ministry, instead of rushing into commercialisation of the GMO, should focus its energy on setting up an effective regulatory mechanism and also a legislation to fix liability of seed monopolies.

According to D Raja, the Ministry is moving in a “hurried and secretive fashion” and is declining to share the bio-safety dossier of GM mustard hybrid DMH11 despite Supreme Court and Central Information Commission orders that require the government to make all such information public.
‘Livelihoods at risk’

“My party has resisted the entry of GMOs into our food and agriculture given that this transgenic technology is unsafe, carries its own political economy of taking away farmers’ seed sovereignty, jeopardises national food security and is risky for farm livelihoods. The move to introduce GM crops into Indian food and farming systems is not in the interest of our agriculture and country,” Raja said in his letter.
Hannan Mollah called all the units of the All India Kisan Sabha to be “vigilant and protest against such moves by the government”.
(This article was published on February 4, 2016)
 
Printable version | Feb 5, 2016 7:20:54 AM |

SOURCE:
http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/economy/policy/govt-pushing-gm-food-left/article8194439.ece © The Hindu Business Line



 

Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Organic agriculture key to feeding the world sustainably

Public Release: 
 
Study analyzes 40 years of science against 4 areas of sustainability
Washington State University
 
PULLMAN, Wash.--Washington State University researchers have concluded that feeding a growing global population with sustainability goals in mind is possible. Their review of hundreds of published studies provides evidence that organic farming can produce sufficient yields, be profitable for farmers, protect and improve the environment and be safer for farm workers.

The review study, "Organic Agriculture in the 21st Century," is featured as the cover story for February issue of the journal Nature Plants and was authored by John Reganold, WSU regents professor of soil science and agroecology and doctoral candidate Jonathan Wachter. It is the first such study to analyze 40 years of science comparing organic and conventional agriculture across the four goals of sustainability identified by the National Academy of Sciences: productivity, economics, environment, and community well being.

"Hundreds of scientific studies now show that organic ag should play a role in feeding the world" said Reganold, lead author of the study. "Thirty years ago, there were just a couple handfuls of studies comparing organic agriculture with conventional. In the last 15 years, these kinds of studies have skyrocketed."

Organic production currently accounts for only one percent of global agricultural land, despite rapid growth in the last two decades.

Critics have long argued that organic agriculture is inefficient, requiring more land to yield the same amount of food. The review paper describes cases where organic yields can be higher than conventional farming methods.

"In severe drought conditions, which are expected to increase with climate change, organic farms have the potential to produce high yields because of the higher water-holding capacity of organically farmed soils," Reganold said.

However, even when yields may be lower, organic agriculture is more profitable for farmers because consumers are willing to pay more. Higher prices can be justified as a way to compensate farmers for providing ecosystem services and avoiding environmental damage or external costs.

Numerous studies in the review also prove the environmental benefits of organic production. Overall, organic farms tend to store more soil carbon, have better soil quality, and reduce soil erosion. Organic agriculture also creates less soil and water pollution and lower greenhouse gas emissions. And it's more energy efficient because it doesn't rely on synthetic fertilizers or pesticides. It is also associated with greater biodiversity of plants, animals, insects and microbes as well as genetic diversity.

Biodiversity increases the services that nature provides like pollination and improves the ability of farming systems to adapt to changing conditions.

Reganold said that feeding the world is not only a matter of yield but also requires examining food waste and the distribution of food.

"If you look at calorie production per capita we're producing more than enough food for 7 billion people now, but we waste 30 to 40 percent of it," Reganold said. "It's not just a matter of producing enough, but making agriculture environmentally friendly and making sure that food gets to those who need it."

Reganold and Wachter suggest that no single type of farming can feed the world. Rather, what's needed is a balance of systems, "a blend of organic and other innovative farming systems, including agroforestry, integrated farming, conservation agriculture, mixed crop/livestock and still undiscovered systems."

Reganold and Wachter recommend policy changes to address the barriers that hinder the expansion of organic agriculture. Such hurdles include the costs of transitioning to organic certification, lack of access to labor and markets, and lack of appropriate infrastructure for storing and transporting food. Legal and financial tools are necessary to encourage the adoption of innovative, sustainable farming practices.
###
Citation: Reganold, John P. and Jonathan M. Wachter. Organic agriculture in the twenty-first century. Nature Plants. Vol. 2 (2016) DOI: 10.1038/NPLANTS.2015.221
http://css.wsu.edu/people/faculty/john-p-reganold


SOURCE : http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2016-02/wsu-oak020116.php

ARTICLE : Why This Farmer Refused To Plow His Land

How a “do nothing” approach to farming yields more food and happier people.

February 3, 2016

As a young man in the 1930s, Masanobu Fukuoka worked in the city of Yokohama, Japan, as a plant researcher. Once on an evening walk, weak from a bout of pneumonia, he collapsed. “Everything that had possessed me, all the agonies, disappeared like dreams and illusions,” he later wrote in The One-Straw Revolution, a book that’s one part practical growing handbook and part Buddhist opus. “And something one might call ‘true nature’ stood revealed.” Fukuoka couldn’t fathom a return to modern life. So he spent the next seven decades, until his death in 2008, pursuing that vision of true nature by farming his family’s land on Japan’s southern island of Shikoku.

On his small commercial plot, he rejected machinery, chemicals, compost, and all forms of manmade order, believing that with minimal input, nature’s methods would trump modern society’s. His rice plants sprouted dense, golden heads of grain; the yields from his paddies surpassed those of conventional farms. The straw he spread around to smother weeds eventually decomposed and fed the soil underneath. He scattered vegetable seeds through his mandarin orchard, and thick daikon roots and ruffled mustard greens grew wherever conditions were right. His tangled trees hung with sweet, juicy fruits. “When you walked through his orchard, you didn’t see a human creation,” says Larry Korn, Fukuoka’s longtime student and the editor of Fukuoka’s seminal first book. “You were looking directly at nature.”

The One-Straw Revolution coalesces around Fukuoka’s philosophy that “the ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.” It was published by Rodale in 1978 and has since been translated into more than 25 languages. Fukuoka went on to write several other books, including The Natural Way of Farming: The Theory and Practice of Green Philosophy, The Road Back to Nature: Regaining the Paradise Lost, and Sowing Seeds in the Desert: Natural Farming, Global Restoration, and Ultimate Food Security. Larry Korn’s biography of Fukuoka, One Straw Revolutionary, details Fukuoka’s methods and compares and contrasts them with other natural farming techniques like permaculture. At heart, Fukuoka’s natural farming philosophy is simple: Closely observe the natural world. Live in tune with its rhythms. The fruits of your labors will be sweeter than ever imagined possible.

SOURCE : http://www.rodalesorganiclife.com/garden/why-this-farmer-refused-to-plow-his-land?cid=soc_Rodale%27s+Organic+Life+-+RodalesOrganicLife_FBPAGE_Rodale%27s+Organic+Life__

Monday, February 1, 2016